Partner Spotlight: Why the UAE is raising the bar for passenger information
Chadi Farran is the Business Development Manager at Energy International, a transportation systems integrator working…
For most transit agencies, the passenger information network is no longer built around a single display technology. It is an estate that has accumulated over time: LED boards that are still operationally sound, LCD screens suited to sheltered, high-footfall sites and newer e-paper displays introduced to cut power consumption and reach locations that were previously off-grid or uneconomical to cable.
Each generation was the right decision when it was made. But together, they create a management problem across display technologies with multiple management layers.
The question facing agencies is therefore not which technology wins, but how to modernise without making it harder to run.
Passenger information is not converging on a single display type. Industry forecasts put LED at the largest share of the installed market today, while e-paper is projected to be the fastest-growing segment over the next several years, at a forecast CAGR of 18.4% through 2031, ahead of the wider passenger information market (market forecast).
The implication is that agencies will be managing a broader technology mix for years to come, not transitioning wholesale from one platform to the next.
Sustainability targets, budget pressure and procurement timelines all push in the same direction, but none of them justifies scrapping infrastructure that still works. Existing LED and LCD assets often remain well suited to their sites and have years of useful life left.
So, modernisation stays incremental. New technology is layered in alongside existing assets rather than replacing them in a single cycle. The cost of that approach is operational fragmentation. As the estate grows, agencies find themselves running:
That complexity and overhead compounds as the network scales.
The agencies best positioned for the next decade will not be the ones that standardise on a single display type. They will be the ones that put a single operational layer over a deliberately mixed estate.
A technology-agnostic management platform lets an agency:
The harder question is how this is achieved. Cross-vendor management is not a dashboard exercise. It depends on interoperability at the data and device level: real-time information through SIRI or GTFS-RT, schedule data, integration with third-party APIs, and, where relevant, roadside and on-vehicle equipment. A management layer is only as agnostic as the standards it is built on. Platforms that ignore this re-lock agencies into a single supplier under a different name.
Papercast manufactures e-paper displays, so why would we build, and why would an agency trust, a platform designed to manage hardware we do not make?
The answer is that building displays is exactly what taught us where the integration problems are. We have spent years solving connectivity, power, diagnostics and content delivery at the device level, and that work does not stop at our own product line. We are confident enough in our hardware to compete for each site on its merits rather than through lock-in. An agency that can manage its LED, LCD and e-paper estate through one platform is an agency free to buy the right display for each location, including, where it fits, ours.
The future of passenger information is not a single display technology. It is a network flexible enough to evolve, and simple enough to run at scale while it does.
If you are managing a mixed display estate today, we can map your current technologies, suppliers and management systems against a single operational layer, and show you where the duplication and risk sit.
Chadi Farran is the Business Development Manager at Energy International, a transportation systems integrator working…
Preparing for the world stage As Canada welcomes millions of visitors for FIFA World Cup…